Interest of S.M.

Client's niece filed a faulty claim against him and motioned to remove him as co-guardian for his sister. Niece's claim was based on assumption only and had no basis in fact. Through investigation, witness interviews, and a successful, contested court hearing, we were able to reveal the truth and show that, in fact, niece was the one who had committed the act she claimed was a breach of fiduciary duties. Client remained in his position as co-guardian. Niece's motion for removal was denied. Client was awarded attorney fees and costs.